Art is, in the language of signs,
what poetry, philosophy and fiction are in the languages of words
As such there are dialects, competencies, vocabularies,
personal vernacular, jargon
what poetry, philosophy and fiction are in the languages of words
As such there are dialects, competencies, vocabularies,
personal vernacular, jargon
To say that one doesn’t understand art at all reveals that it is the idea of art that has been alienated,
not the ability to recognise and engage with art on any level
not the ability to recognise and engage with art on any level
Certain modes of art will surely be unfamiliar,
and one may be inexperienced in discernment
in an analogous way to how one’s palate might
be undeveloped in a gastronomical sense,
limiting the tastes one has acquired
and one may be inexperienced in discernment
in an analogous way to how one’s palate might
be undeveloped in a gastronomical sense,
limiting the tastes one has acquired
It would follow however
that the underlying ability to appreciate and to create art is as natural
and inalienable as listening and speech
that the underlying ability to appreciate and to create art is as natural
and inalienable as listening and speech
someone will resonate more with
something I have made than I do
There is no direct line
that joins the act of making art
to the separate act of appreciating it